Stephen Terry, Director

Still Waters Ministry

 

Backslidden People

Commentary for the December 14, 2019 Sabbath School Lesson

 

"On that day the Book of Moses was read aloud in the hearing of the people and there it was found written that no Ammonite or Moabite should ever be admitted into the assembly of God, because they had not met the Israelites with food and water but had hired Balaam to call a curse down on them. (Our God, however, turned the curse into a blessing.) When the people heard this law, they excluded from Israel all who were of foreign descent." Nehemiah 13:1-3, NIV

Fundamentalists love books like Nehemiah because, read from a certain perspective, God is portrayed as someone who is waiting for each of us to mess up so he can zap us with punishment. These individuals love rules. They provide a standard to condemn others, and by implication exalt themselves as examples of obedience. This was the character displayed by the Pharisees who constantly challenged Christ based on the rules of behavior they sought to enforce. However, they had made mercy and compassion something only available to those who fit their definition of obedience. Once this was done, it opened the door to all manner of abuse of those who were not so obedient. It even led to murder as the example of what they did to Christ attests. This is perhaps why so many see a distinction between the Old Testament and the New. Very vivid examples of untampered justice can be found throughout the Old Testament, from Uzzah being slain when he reached out to steady the Ark of the Covenant, [i] to the two bears who mauled forty-two children at Elisha's command.[ii] It is a difficult transition for some to make from the prophet commanding children to be ripped by bears to the Savior who welcomed children to him and rebuked his disciples for keeping them away.[iii]

Of course, if we are tempted to think that compassion is the sum of the Gospel message, the book of Revelation reminds us that there is a limit to that compassion. Perhaps that is why it is placed at the end, to demonstrate by place as much as by its message that eventually accounts are to be balanced. Sadly, however, too many want to do the balancing of those accounts now. They are on a mission, like those ancient Pharisees, to purify the church. They fail to realize their own sinfulness when addressing the sin of others. As Jesus said, the beam of their own sin blinds them to such an extent that they are the last who should be attempting to eradicate sin from others.[iv] When we fail to realize this, we open the door to all manner of dysfunctional behaviors. In the case of Nehemiah, we may even find justification for racism in passages like the one at the top of this commentary. This can result in us automatically excluding those nationalities that we do not recognize as Christian, or even not Christian enough. Such a perspective had been used in the past by Puritan settlers who banished and even executed Quakers like Mary Dyer.[v] Later when Irish immigration increased, it was used against the influx of Roman Catholics. Christians seem to have a long history of persecution of those who see things differently. Not only Quakers and Catholics, but American Indians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims and many others have felt the wrath of Christian exceptionalism. In attempting to create a pure heaven on Earth, we have all too often instead managed to create absolute hell for everyone.

We have been naive in not recognizing that compelling others to obey a religious standard we consider holy would result in a reactionary backlash against such efforts. The history of Protestantism should have educated us about this. When Rome attempted to compel all to obey the Catholic Church's vision of God and the priesthood, instead of humbly admitting the authority of Rome over Christian faith and practice, the Protestants rose up and after much bloodshed, threw off that yoke. Yet, we continue to carry forward the same agenda, albeit with a somewhat altered creed. Instead of our experience leading us to eschew persecution, we have honed the process, demonstrating how well we learned at the feet of Rome. How could we come to the point, two millennia later, where we have managed to preserve minutely the rules of the Old Testament, but little of the mercy taught by Jesus? When did it become more important to be right than to be loving?

This week, a pastor from another country posted on my Facebook timeline wanting instructions on how to disfellowship someone. I consider it strange that he did not instead ask how to save someone who was struggling. He reminded me of the disciples wanting to call down fire on a Samaritan town for refusing lodging for Jesus.[vi] Too many among us are all about punishing the lost. But just as Jesus rebuked his disciples for their attitude in that circumstance, his words continue to challenge our rule-based, hard-heartedness now. The Pharisees could not understand why the rules of Moses were given if they are not in accordance with God's will, and they pointedly asked Jesus about this when discussing the issue of divorce.[vii] His response was that these rules were based on the hardness of the human heart and not upon God's will. The danger of this is even more apparent when we realize we cannot see within people's hearts. We can only judge based on what we see outwardly and almost never is that a complete picture. Sometimes, based on the arrogance of 20/20 hindsight, we feel we have superior discernment and act as though we would not fall into errors of judgment like the biblical patriarchs and kings often did. But some of these were individuals who communicated with God face to face and spoke with angels. If they were not immune to errors in judgment, how can we be so presumptuous?

We might do well to recognize that God alone is the only one capable of judging others, for two reasons. First, he alone is capable of seeing into the heart.[viii] And second, his judgment is always tempered with mercy. Some might question the mercy in view of the dramatic images of Revelation, but the fact that the very apocalyptic scenarios that some are constantly proclaiming have not happened yet is evidence of his mercy and compassion. God is not willing that any should face such a horrific end and his patience with us as he pleads with us continually shows us a deeper than human love. Because God is like this and we are not, we often get it wrong when we take it upon ourselves to confront sin in others. Like Nehemiah, we would say, "You are an Ammonite? Get out of here! You are a Moabite! Get out of here!" We would cast aside those who differ from us in culture or appearance without exception, based on unquestioning obedience to a peculiar Bible passage. But when we examine the biblical record more carefully, we find that God granted several very notable exceptions to the rules that some might feel were written just as deeply in stone as the Decalogue.

The passage cited by Nehemiah from Deuteronomy 23:3 had already been contravened several times long before Nehemiah was born. One prominent example can be found in the book of Ruth. Although a Moabitess, she married Boaz and was welcomed into Israel. In spite of the condemnation of her people by Moses, the Davidic, and therefore the Messianic line, came through her. Perhaps this demonstrates that, while we want to exclude others from fellowship, God looks instead for reasons to include others. We may jostle and shove until sheep we do not approve of find themselves outside the sheepfold in the cold and darkness, but Jesus goes out into those nether regions looking for those he can bring back. He searches for the broken, the hurting, and the marginalized and even pursues those who have no idea they have wandered off. But unlike us, he doesn't pursue them with a stick to drive them. Instead he chases them with blessings, knowing how weak they are and how much they need him, even if they do not realize it.

God does not limit his blessings to those who obey him, like we would do. He blesses good and evil alike. There is a saying about an ugly child that it has a face only a mother could love. We might also say that with our flawed characters we are people that only God can love. And he does, without reservation. Only that kind of love could die upon the cross with forgiveness, rather than condemnation, on his lips. Nehemiah may be touted as a great reformer in Israel, but all of his reforms could only be outward ones. Perhaps this is why when he returned, many had already fallen away. But real reform is in the heart, is inclusive and compassionate and does not seek remembrance from God for good behavior. It is instead the change produced by the one who gave the hope of life everlasting to those who deserved nothing.



[i] 1 Chronicles 13:9-10

[ii] 2 Kings 2:23-24

[iii][iii] Matthew 19:13-15

[iv] Matthew 7:3-5

[v] "Mary Dyer," Wikipedia

[vi] Luke 9:51-56

[vii] Matthew 19:3-9

[viii] 1 Samuel 16:7

 

 

 

If you enjoyed this article, you might also enjoy this book written by the author, currently on sale..

To learn more click on this link.
Creation: Myth or Majesty

 

 

 

This Commentary is a Service of Still Waters Ministry

www.visitstillwaters.com

 

Follow us on Twitter: @digitalpreacher

 

If you wish to receive these weekly commentaries direct to your e-mail inbox for free, simply send an e-mail to:

commentaries-subscribe@visitstillwaters.com

Scripture marked (NIV) taken from the Holy Bible, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. Used by permission. NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® and NIV® are registered trademarks of Biblica, Inc. Use of either trademark for the offering of goods or services requires the prior written consent of Biblica US, Inc.

 

 

 

If you want a paperback copy of the current Sabbath School Bible Study Quarterly, you may purchase one by clicking here and typing the word "quarterly" into the search box.