The Day of the Lord

Stephen Terry

 

Commentary for the June 17, 2017 Sabbath School Lesson

 

“But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.”  2 Peter 3:8-9, NIV

The Seventh-day Adventist Church was legally incorporated as a religious denomination in 1863, during the height of the Civil War. The immediacy of the Parousia predominated the thinking of those pioneers to the extent that it achieved secondary billing only to the Seventh-day Sabbath in the denomination’s name. That immediacy grew out of the Great Disappointment of 1844 that resulted from the teachings of William Miller who believed that he had found the formula to determine the exact date of Christ’s return. This was in spite of biblical passages stating that such date setting was impossible.[i] Nonetheless, not to be deterred by the error of setting a date, those early Adventists felt the immediacy was there even if they did not know the exact moment. Referencing passages from Matthew, chapter 24 and 2 Timothy, chapter 3 as well as the prophecies found in Daniel and the Revelation, they found ample evidence of parallels between those texts and what they were seeing in the world around them. “As in the days of Noah,”[ii] wickedness and evil thinking seemed to be growing by leaps and bounds; surely the Lord’s return could not be far off.

But in the interim, with two world wars that swept tens of millions into early graves and the development of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons capable of producing unparalleled death and devastation, incredibly we are still waiting for the promised return. In a few decades we will have reached the bicentennial of the Millerite disappointment. And if our surprise at the delay after a few centuries seems fitting, what of those, who like Peter, expected the return two thousand years ago? Of course, they are beyond caring at this point. For them, what will happen will happen. They need only rest in their graves until such time as everything is finally revealed. But for the living, things are not so simple. When we reach our sixth, seventh, or eighth decade of life, do we look back at what we have made important over the years and think maybe those priorities would have been different if we had known we would still be here waiting? Would we have been more or less fervent in the expression of our faith to others? Would we take a chance on alienating them by telling them about the signs pointing to Jesus’ return, or would we lose that sense of immediacy as the years marched by and all things remained as they have always been? Would we regret the time spent on evangelizing that could have been spent on improving the situation for ourselves and our families here and now? Would we have made our faith secondary to the advancement of our careers?

We look at the Bible, and we can trace the fulfillment of past prophecies. We see the march of nations presented in the great image of Daniel, chapter 2. The same timeline is presented again in chapters 7 and 8, but the prophecies all have a similar haziness as they reach the modern era. They are so specific as to be limited to particular persons and empires as in the cases of Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great, or Alexander’s four generals, Cassander, Ptolemy, Antigonus, and Seleucus. Perhaps that is why some have tried to find similar specific meaning in the ten toes of the image in chapter 2, but this is problematic. Those toes are in existence right up until the moment that the stone strikes the feet of the image, an event seen as the return of Christ. But every account that tries to identify the toes with the nations of Europe, the common application, runs aground on the simple observation that any ten nations that existed at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire would not be identical to any list currently in effect. In fact, this is often acknowledged with the admission that nations such as the Vandals and the Ostrogoths that existed in the declining years of the Roman Empire, no longer exist today. A quick search on Google for “ten toes” and “Daniel 2” will reveal that the certainty of the association of the toes with particular nations has faded almost completely away. Instead, they are often referred to as an undetermined symbol that nonetheless has attributes of the Roman Empire without its strength.[iii]

Such a nebulous symbolism makes it very difficult to hang one’s prophetic “hat” on that wobbling peg. Instead it beggars comparison with a gypsy fortune teller speaking in such general terms that they could be true of almost anyone. This seems to wander far afield from Peter’s reference to the reliability of prophecy earlier in his second epistle.[iv] So how can we have certainty in the face of such uncertainties? Must we abandon faith when we cannot “nail down” these specifics? Perhaps this is more challenging for the biblical literalist who feels that the interpretation of prophecy they may have devoted their life to believing and sharing is in question. But just as the Millerites faced a similar disappointment in October of 1844, a disappointment quickly set aside by the new interpretation of prophecy put forward by Hiram Edson the very next day, a fresh perspective on the prophecies may set aside this modern dilemma as well.

The problem with prophecy is that it is often either true or false depending on the perspective of the interpreter. 20/20 hindsight often helps as it does with Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander, but if the imagery is too vague then we end up with difficulties even looking back as in the case of Antiochus Epiphanes and Daniel, chapter 11. Who is the King of the North, or the King of the South for that matter? Many scholars have tried to pin this one down, even with obviously contrived efforts to equate the symbolism with Russia and the United States. This is perhaps in part because the literalist may have difficulty living with ambiguity. But perhaps we should develop the ability to say, “I don’t know,” when faced with passages that challenge our ability to decipher them. It is OK to have various views of interpretation in the face of such ambiguities, but we tread on unstable ground when we insist that there is no other possible interpretation than the one we hold based solely on our opinion or that of some celebrity we admire.

When we are young we tend to want the world to fall neatly into place. We often base our lives on that assumption, planning our educations, careers and families around certain principles. Whether the principles are universally held is immaterial. We feel that they are foundational to who we are and where we are headed. However, as the years roll by, we find that some of those principles needed adjusting to fit circumstances, perhaps to introduce a more compassionate outcome to a situation. We come to understand that our tendency to see what was as clearly black and white as the ink on a page now fades into shades of gray. We come to learn that grace is more important than rules. If it were not for that grace, no rule could save us.[v] That recognition causes love to sprout in our hearts for the God who makes it possible.

We go through life with our ironclad principles and in the process we hurt others when we should be healing and compassionate. I am not pointing fingers here, for we all have done it.[vi] If the Holy Spirit is speaking to our hearts with the truth from God, we begin to understand why Jesus has not yet come. We really need and want more time to become what God would have us to be, surrendered and open to His leading. When we learn to become malleable under His guidance, perhaps then we will have a right to ask, “Why the delay?” But of course, we will already know and will no longer have any desire to ask. Instead, we will spend the remainder of our life resting ever deeper into the arms of grace. Instead of seeking intricate prophetic constructs, we will find the balm of healing and restoration in the pages of our Bibles. We will discover the spiritual presence of God in the way the Bible speaks to our hearts. Every time we read it through, it will have a continuing dialogue with what is going on in our lives at that moment. No other book has that power. That is a certainty more sure than any interpretation of prophecy, wall charts notwithstanding. It is an assurance we can take with us throughout our lives, whether we live to see the Parousia or we simply enjoy a life well lived, ending with only the comfort of being surrounded by family and loved ones.



[i] Matthew 24:36

[ii] Matthew 24:37

[iii] For further insights on the ten toes, you may wish to read my Commentary on Daniel, Chapter 2.

[iv] 2 Peter 1:19

[v] Ephesians 2:8-9

[vi] Romans 3:10

 

 

 

If you enjoyed this commentary, you might also enjoy this book. Now on sale with reduced pricing with over a 30% discount!

To learn more click on this link.
Creation: Myth or Majesty?

 

 

 

This Commentary is a Service of Still Waters Ministry

www.visitstillwaters.com

 

If you wish to receive these weekly commentaries direct to your e-mail inbox for free, simply send an e-mail to:

commentaries-subscribe@visitstillwaters.com

Scripture marked (NIV) taken from the Holy Bible, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. Used by permission. NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® and NIV® are registered trademarks of Biblica, Inc. Use of either trademark for the offering of goods or services requires the prior written consent of Biblica US, Inc.

 

 

 

If you want a paperback copy of the current Sabbath School Bible Study Quarterly, you may purchase one by clicking here and typing the word "quarterly" into the search box.