Symbolic Acts

Stephen Terry

 

Commentary for the November 7, 2015 Sabbath School Lesson

 

“In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.” Hebrews 1:1-2, NIV

Perhaps you remember with me those days of long ago when in kindergarten, the teacher would encourage our artistic leanings by seating us at a low table and plop in front of us a formless blob of modeling clay. It may have started out grey, green, blue, or red, but through the kneading of many tiny hands and the addition of bits of color from other similar blobs the current color had become amorphous. Like many children faced with no clue from either the shape or color, when asked to “make something,” we gravitated toward snakes. Rolling long, cylindrical shapes with bits of clay torn from the mother mass, we would taper each end to make it “snaky.” If we felt particularly artistic, we might have rolled a pair of tiny little eyeballs for the serpents. While there might be a gifted student that would make a Pokey-shaped horse, we were proud of our snakes and thought we had created masterpieces.

Maybe God feels the same way, or maybe He just started simple, but He made over three thousand different species of snakes.[i] All are carnivorous but only a few are poisonous to man to any serious degree. As a young boy on my great-grandmother’s farm on the western side of the Puget Sound, I would wander her fields with my siblings and sometimes come upon piles of harmless Garter Snakes lying on rocks or boards, warming themselves in the sun. Being cold-blooded reptiles, they needed this to get their morning going as coffee does for so many of us. With a budding interest in biology, we would peel snakes off the pile and study their reactions. After a while, they learned to recognize our approach and would slither off into various cracks and crevices so we could not catch them unless we were extremely fast. But even watching the piles of snakes disappear into nothingness was magical and entertaining to small children.

We did not feel threatened by the snakes. They were harmless, and we already had a nascent understanding of man’s place in the world of nature. Although we meant no harm to the snakes, we knew also we could do what we wished with them, and they could not resist us. It was the same with those clay snakes, we could mold them back into the original lump of clay and either make something else, or make more snakes like the first one. If we liked the results, we would be more likely to make more of the same. If not, we would reintegrate the project and make something different. We understand this as simple children, yet we struggle to accept the concept as adults when it comes to God. If we recognize Him as our Creator, that implies a certain power over what He has created. But if we do not want to recognize that power, we can deny that He is Creator. Of course, if He is, then this makes about as much sense as my clay snakes or even the Garter Snakes denying my existence. They can go about pretending all they want, but reality will demonstrate otherwise. Their only accomplishment would be self-deception.

We have become quite good at such self-deception. In spite of many accounts from the past of direct encounters with such a Creator God, we deny the reality of the existence of such a Being. We pride ourselves on our “superior” knowledge and relegate belief in such beings to the realm of childhood fairy tales or women’s superstitions. However, the intuition of those women may be more in tune with the idea of a Creator than we realize. Many churches are populated more by women than men, women who continue to bring those children week after week to hear those “fairy tales.” This is, in some ways, ironic, for the biblical record indicates it was a woman who first approached the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden.[ii] Yet it often appears that women are more eager to return to that lost idyll than men. Strangely, in spite of this, they tend to be excluded from leadership of those same churches. Maybe it was not always so that men were so out of tune spiritually.

In the early accounts, it was Enoch that walked so closely with God that he eventually walked right into heaven.[iii] And Noah alone was found faithful in the entire Earth.[iv] But what is notable about these examples is that they are given as contrasts to the prevailing wickedness of their times. It appears that even then, the person who remained faithful in his or her belief in God was a rarity. Of course, this is difficult to understand if all the non-believers of Noah’s day were descended from two individuals actually created by God, and later, were all descended from faithful Noah. How could things go so awry? Some might think it is because God is disengaged with mankind. But if that is an excuse, how do we explain the wickedness that arose anyway, when, according to the biblical account, God flooded the Earth to eliminate wickedness. That engagement does not seem to have prevented the resurgence of evil. What more could God have done?

Maybe some feel He should come down and live with us. But He did that, and we crucified Him. Maybe if he raised someone from the dead, it would make a difference. He did that, too, and we plotted to kill that person, Lazarus, as well.[v] Over and over, He tried to reach us, often through tears, but we killed and mistreated the messengers. Through symbolism, they portrayed the relationship between the Creator and His creation. As Jeremiah pointed out with the illustration of the potter sitting at his wheel and forming something from the clay taken from the ground,[vi] God also lovingly formed those first humans we know as Adam and Eve.[vii]

The potter at his wheel has the right to form any shape he wishes according to his ability. He may make a beautiful and elegant vase, a simple but useful oil lamp, or a porcelain bedpan. It is the potter who determines the form and thus the function of his creation. But what if the bedpan decides it wants to be a vase instead? To do so it would have to live in defiance of the purpose of the potter, who intended it to be a bedpan. Even when we may see bedpans holding flowers in water, no one doubts that it is still a bedpan and not an elegant vase. No amount of repurposing can change that. This is so even if the bedpan starts calling itself a vase and states the potter intended it to be one.

How often do we deny our Creator, believing He Created us to be something other than what we are? Like some, we may believe that even though we are obviously male, we are really female or vice versa. Then we go to great lengths, including surgery, to make our belief real. Or as some others may believe, even though we are created with the biology for procreation, somehow it was not intended for that purpose, and same-sex relationships were what the Potter intended in spite of the structure of our bodies. Then there are still others who believe that the womb was never intended by the Creator to be a safe place to bring new life into the world, but was instead to be invaded at will in order to bring those nascent beings to a violent end. While these destroy the image of God before birth, too many also do so after the child is born. Some willingly bring disease, disability and death to others as byproducts of their quest for profit. Sadly, for some there is not even this much of a reason to destroy God’s creatures. For those who have the power and the inkling, the simple desire to end the life of their fellow man or any other creature is adequate reason to do so.

Perhaps in such destructive behavior is manifest the less obvious intent to not only destroy that which God has created, but in so doing to deny Him as Creator and the One who is able to define our purpose. When we do this, who is left to define that purpose? Do we define it ourselves, or is it instead thrust upon us by those lesser self-stylized deities who rule our planet in the interests of their own personal power and greed? And why would we think that such would never lead us astray, believing that they have only the truth and our best interests at heart? Perhaps it is time we consider the purposes of the Potter and return to that which we were created to be. He has been calling to us since the beginning.



[i] "Snakes," http://www.arkive.org/snakes/

[ii] Genesis 3

[iii] Genesis 5:21-24

[iv] Genesis 6:5-8

[v] John 12:9-11

[vi] Jeremiah 18:1-10

[vii] Genesis 2:7

 

 

 

If you enjoyed this commentary, you might also enjoy this book.

To learn more click on this link.
The God Who Is: Explorations in Deity

 

 

 

This Commentary is a Service of Still Waters Ministry

www.visitstillwaters.com

 

If you wish to receive these weekly commentaries direct to your e-mail inbox for free, simply send an e-mail to:

commentaries-subscribe@visitstillwaters.com

Scripture marked (NIV) taken from the Holy Bible, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. Used by permission. NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® and NIV® are registered trademarks of Biblica, Inc. Use of either trademark for the offering of goods or services requires the prior written consent of Biblica US, Inc.

 

 

 

If you want a paperback copy of the current Sabbath School Bible Study Quarterly, you may purchase one by clicking here and typing the word "quarterly" into the search box.